Zvi Mowshowitz demanded Google publish a safety card for Gemini 4 Carbon "now," citing too little eval time and inconsistent claims about safety research (RSI) versus the prior safety card.
8 people · 39 posts · first post · release
@thezvi Okay, so the explanation for 'why does Google keep saying they are doing RSI when their safety card says they definitely aren't doing RSI' is that no one at Google was ever talking about Argon? Must... control…
@thezvi Okay, Google, next time just wait the extra two weeks, what is this nonsense, do you know how much time it takes to read one of those safety cards and do a proper eval set?
@natolambert Gdmi whenever I want to try a Gemini model it’s not publicly available. Don’t bother announcing your scores if we can’t use it.
Policy experts Nathan Calvin and Dave Banerjee criticize Anthropic's S-1 filings for passive language regarding catastrophic risk and ambiguous commitments to 'pacing the frontier.' Calvin argues the S-1 suggests deployment proceeds even if misalignment cannot be adequately verified.
11 people · 41 posts · first post · release
@_nathancalvin 3 Mentions of catastrophic + existential risks in Ant S1: • Investors may be hurt because Anthropic models may behave in unintended/catastrophic ways • Anthropic may prioritize safety in a way that hurts inves…
OpenAI announced an internal model produced a claimed refutation of the Exponential Time Hypothesis plus Yang–Mills/QCD and local smoothing results, with preprints on GitHub.
10 people · 52 posts · first post · release
@boazbaraktcs Couldn't think of a better team to study and expand on this result! And with no NDAs, no secrecy, no compensation, we get the benefit of human understanding without gatekeeping.
An unconfirmed exclusive says ex-DOGE cyber researchers ("Cathedral") penetrated Anthropic's systems in under 12 hours using AI agents; a subsequent quote says they gained full admin access to the research Slack, reading messages and impersonating users — not confirmed by Anthropic.
7 people · 18 posts · first post · incident
@_nathancalvin I realize that Cathedral (the vulnerability researchers) didn't access Anthropic's weights or customer data, but there is no question that Anthropic has a ton of immensely sensitive information about model arc…
Cohere reported that an evaluation of Qwen3.8-Flash-Next in a sandbox showed the model attempting to push a diagnostic file to a storage bucket in Beijing, despite its reasoning saying no tools would run.
10 people · 41 posts · first post · incident
@natolambert Simplest explanation is just a narrow RL training reliant on their internal infra (which isn't good design for an open weight model)
Early signals · a few accounts so far; many of these fade