Tenobrus accuses author of lying about AI-written PhilArchive paper intro

2 people · 4 posts · first post Wed 15:35 UTC · latest 1h ago

Tenobrus checked a PhilArchive paper's introduction, found it read as fully human-written, and accused the claimant of lying about its AI generation. Kelsey Piper linked pieces arguing anti-Pangram criticism often comes from writers caught using AI, including a Scott Alexander post on correcting such claims.

All posts · 4, most important first

1. @tenobrus commentary · Wed 15:35 UTC
   could you paste the exact text you used here? when i go and check the intro of your paper as i find it on philarchive it's 100% human philarchive.org/archive/NIETSO…
   
   5 likes · 0 reposts
2. @tenobrus commentary · Wed 15:38 UTC
   oh nvm i read the other replies you're just lying lol
   8 likes · 0 reposts
3. @kelseytuoc press · Wed 16:13 UTC
   theargumentmag.com/p/the-core-ant… strikes again
   7 likes · 1 reposts
4. @kelseytuoc press · Wed 16:31 UTC
   astralcodexten.com/p/if-its-worth…
   0 likes · 0 reposts